Saturday Special: Stan the Man [Film]

 

“Stan Mann, a new money multi-millionaire, whose life consists of ladies, gambling and booze, lives at a 5-star hotel where the staff tends to his every need. Known as “Stan the Man” for his extreme generosity, he gets mixed up in a casino gambling scheme with Russian Mobsters and in one fateful bet, Stan loses everything. Planning to drown his sorrows in a bottle, Stan is critically wounded in a liquor store robbery, where he takes the bullet intended for the store clerk, Kristi. During a near-death experience in the ER, a slightly resentful Angel gives Stan 30 days to change his ways and redeem himself, and find his one true love.” – October Coast PR

 

******

 

I have been searching for the words to describe Stan the Man for quite some time. Well, maybe just a few days, but it is indeed something that hasn’t faded from my thought process. Initially I just wanted to say it is a “fun” film. Because it certainly is. Maybe delightfully cheesy? Yes, and obviously this is a compliment. But, when I really think about it, in my heart of hearts, I feel as though I should call this film “whimsical”. I think it fits. It’s a timeless tale of a man who seems to have everything, but the power of love can not be bought and all the while may be the most precious gift that this sometimes cold world can allow. And who doesn’t love a great second chance story? That is literally what we have here with this film. It’s literally the plot of the film. And I believe that it is done so amazing, incorporating just about every single romcom troupe imaginable, but manages to not be annoying for it. Which is a huge feat in my opinion, and something that everyone involved with the film should be extremely proud of for accomplishing.

 

 

Director/Co-writer and the dude behind Stan himself, Steven Chase was good in the titular role. But, as we tend to do around here at TWS, we have to give a shout out to the powerful female performances of Stan the Man. Dana Daurey is an absolute stand out during her time on screen. I’ve always said, publicly or not, that the best way to tell if a performer has done a great job is if you try to imagine another performer stepping in and taking over the role, and if it just doesn’t feel like it’s possible, that should be a pretty good sign that they were wonderful. I could say the same for Katherine Kelly Lang, who is of course absolutely phenomenal, but what else could you expect from the most seasoned and master of their class performer to appear in this film? Lang truly seems as though she doesn’t know how to give a bad performance, a quality that only the combination of time, passion, and natural born talent can create.

And then there is Anne Leighton, which if you couldn’t tell by the way I structured this whole thing, was my absolute favorite in the film. I feel that her character was deliberately set out to be the most loved character in the film, and Leighton grasped firmly onto this concept and absolutely nailed it. She was as absolutely delightful. I was actually aware of Leighton’s work, at least in one somewhat forgettable action film from a few years ago that doesn’t need to be named. But, I remember thinking that she was probably somebody to watch out for in the future. Well, it looks like the future is here, and I am seeing a perfect performance from one of the finest performers in the business. For those of you reading this who are in the business, PUT ANNE LEIGHTON IN MORE THINGS.

I implore you all to watch this whimsical and delightful movie. No, it’s not a 3 1/2 hour opus about political corruption and gangster squabbling, or a dark take on class warfare, but they don’t all have to be, do they? If you’d just like to have a little fun whilst acknowledging the power of love, I would highly recommend Stan the Man.

 

Stan the Man is available now on DVD & VOD wherever you purchase great films.

 

 

Paul Chart [Interview]

 

 

Today’s interview subject is a multi-faceted human being who has done some incredible work in so many different positions within the world of film. It’s Paul Chart, Everyone! Paul has been in the business for over 40 years and has accomplished some amazing feats in his time. One of these great feats was what initially drew me into the hopes of having him on the site to answer a few questions. This would be the 1997 film he wrote and directed entitled American Perfekt. It is an absolutely incredible film that has lived in my mind since I first saw it as a young man. It’s wonderfully written and features amazing performances from the likes of Amanda Plummer, Fairuza Balk, Robert Forster (RIP), and our new friend and guest of TWS, Rutanya Alda. It is an absolute classic film.

Through getting to know Paul a bit more, I have learned that he has a wonderful short film making waves right now entitled, Nasty. And Folks, it is WONDERFUL. Mr. Chart was kind enough to let me check it out, and I will be sharing my thoughts with you soon! Like real soon. Like Sunday. It will be discussed on Sunday. It will also be discussed below in the incredible answers that Paul was able to carve some time out his schedule to answer for us. So Folks, please enjoy some brilliant words from the great Paul Chart!

 

******

 

What initially drew you to the world of filmmaking? Was it something you had wanted to do since your youth, or did you just happen to find yourself in this world one day? 

The truth is, I can’t recollect a conscious time when I didn’t want to make films. From the age of about 4 or 5, I was totally obsessed. 

But what actually drew me? Two main reasons: One, a cliche, my childhood in London was a dark, dreary and lonely place to play in, and films offered me a glimpse of a completely different life, location and future. In short, they offered hope. Secondly, they also offered me control. I already suspected my thought processes were way too tangential and ill-equipped to navigate the conventional 9-5 life heading my way, and so I definitely needed a job that wasn’t a job. Film allowed me both a career and a way to make sense of that chaos. I was suddenly holding up a piece of film of someone walking across the room. I had another piece of mag film with their dialogue. Another with footsteps. Another with a ticking clock, etc. It gave the chaos around me a form and rhythm I could understand and control and even repeat. A way of making sense of my own story, and possibly offering something of value and entertainment to others along the way. Along with music, it saved me. 

As for getting involved in actual filmmaking, I had no idea what a director or producer did, let alone how to get into the industry. Movies seemed to be made only by highly qualified professionals, using complex and expensive machinery behind closed doors – and I was a working class kid with no resources and no filmmaker friends, acquaintances or relatives. And so I read books. Shot Super 8mm films on reversal, and learned how to shoot, process and print 35mm stills from negative. This was between the ages of about 8 and 14. My Aunt Yvonne also lived in Borhamwood and I would sometimes stay with the family. Elstree Studios was just a walk away, surrounded by a tall metal fence. But at the back, that fence was covered with bushes and trees. It was here that I cut a hole in the fence and would secretly walk the back lot when nobody was about, trying to figure out how everything was built. The excitement was unexplainable. It still gives me shivers thinking about it now. 

And then VHS arrived, and a certain amount of Heaven entered real life. I could now watch more movies than ever. One or two a day .. more if possible. So by the time I was offered my first industry shot, despite having no experience, I was fairly well educated in film history and production, and roaring to go. Maybe I’m now simply addicted to film. When I’m not writing or shooting or editing or something, I certainly suffer some kind of withdrawal effect. Therapy would probably help, but then I figure the films would be a lot less interesting. Plus I’d be forced to write crap to pay for the sessions. 

Best stay addicted to film and work out my issues that way. It’s the devil I know. 

 

What was your first paid gig in the world of entertainment? And were there any sort of lessons learned from this project that you still value to this day? 

My first professional gig was writing a feature for The British Film Institute called White Lies. Although, that didn’t just happen overnight. There was a considerable lead up to it. 

I was studying for an Honors Degree in Fine Art at Sheffield University, and one of the reasons I’d applied to that particular college was that it also happened to have a half- decent film department which nobody really used. So every weekend, I’d take out as much gear as I could, and get to know how it worked. Before long, I was shooting 16mm neg and reversal, and recording sync sound with a Nagra. Can’t tell you how exciting it was to look across the room and see actual real film gear in a box in my own apartment. Anyway, while at college, I managed to earn a couple of Fuji scholarships which financed a couple of short films. Both films, a comedy called Hand in Hand (made with wonderful Glaswegian filmmaker Jim Shields), and a musical spy thriller called Foreign Bodies. The films ended up being screened at BAFTA, and picking up some awards and attention, the most important of which was some fantastic support from Sir David Puttnam, the most respected and influential British film producer of the time. Puttnam took me under his wing, and introduced me to Colin MacCabe at the British Film Institute. Within a few weeks, I was writing my first feature for the BFI, White Lies

Through Dave Puttnam I met Patsy Pollack, Joyce Gallie, Mary Selway and a whole host of other amazing UK casting agents, actors and artists. Through Joyce, I was introduced to writer/producer Joshua Sinclair (Night Porter, Shaka Zulu) who flew me to Vienna a couple of times to work on my first ‘international’ picture, a plotical thriller called Judgement in Berlin (aka Escape to Freedom). I was originally hired to rewrite Sean Penn’s dialogue but ended up rewriting the whole script with Joshua. 

Those two very different job situations were the first ones that introduced me to the professional film world, and also ultimately bought me to Hollywood where I met my longtime mentor, and close friend, director Irvin Kershner (Never Say Never Again, Empire Strikes Back). Kersh had a formidable reputation as a man who did not suffer fools lightly, and I remember that first drive up to his house being a long and nerve-racking one. All for no reason, however. 

Kersh wasn’t so much gruff and loud, as he was passionate and childlike and intent on getting his shit right. He was also incredibly well-read and had a wicked sense of hunmor. We hit it off from the moment we met, and he immediately hired me to write a huge remake of Forbidden Planet – the first of many projects we collaborated on. Kersh also later produced my debut feature film, American Perfekt

This was all still relatively early on in my career – and what did I learn through all this? Well, there was the physical stuff – which I loved – like how to load film and operate a pro camera, record, edit and mix sync sound, organize a crew, create a budget and schedule, work gracefully under pressure and without sleep, and make sure everyone gets fed (that last one might actually be the most vital). 

Philosophically, however, and I don’t want to sound cute, but the most important thing I learned from all this, was that virtually anything was possible. I mean, as a kid from London, making films was just a dream. Yet here I was, in Hollywood, working with actors and directors I’d admired for years, while constantly shoving my own jaw back into my face in disbelief. That’s the thing I most like to pass on to any prospective filmmaker who feel such things are out of their reach. For despite the film schools and plethora of hyperbolic and technically adept students and social networkers with unprecedented access to amazing new digital gear – there are still dark and lonely places where meeker souls dwell. Souls who have interesting stories and unique points of view to offer, but who might never venture forth into filmmaking without a small shove and a gentle enthusiastic compliment.

 

“American Perkect” (1997) on set.

 

Your 1997 film American Perfekt was one of those absolute gem of a films that came out when I was young and very interested in the world of indie film. And it truly holds up. It is bizarre yet beautiful tale, and I am curious to know what inspired you to bring this story to the screen? Was there something personal behind this storyline? 

Firstly, thank you for the kind words. 

American Perfekt was an idea born out of my experiences in Thatcher’s Britain during the 80’s. It was ostensibly a warning about how relying on any one absolute system of reference for navigating life’s metaphysical challenges might ultimately breakdown and cause one to simply throw the baby out with the bath water in a desperate effort to change the direction of one’s life at any cost. 

At the time, Thatcher had promised to save the country by running it as business – which gave many a feeling of control and security. Issue I had, was that a business is not a democracy. It’s choices are ultimately governed by profit and loss, not compassion and justice for all. This direction seemed to embrace autocracy. Autocracy, historically, does not enjoy giving up power, and will lie, subjugate, dismiss and belittle any opposing voice it sees as a threat to it’s continued survival. That was the political climate which initially created Perfekt. Cut to America in 2020. The film is possibly still relevant. 

American Perfekt also posed the idea that we are all equally good and bad, all able to be friendly, to help those in need and be kind – and also able to be cruel, hate and to kill. It’s the freedom we have to make those choices which ultimately make up our characters. Perfekt was designed, therefore, in two juxtaposing parts. Two sisters faced with similar challenges, make different choices and behold different consequences. I even originally considered casting Amanda (Plummer) as both sisters. 

As for it’s physical production, I’d just landed in America with a dear friend of mine, John Conway, and we needed to make a cheap first feature – and how complicated could it be to shoot in the desert? Well, more complicated than you’d expect. But what really made a complicated script work was Robert Forster. I needed someone so comforting in the lead, that even if you turned around to find them standing over you with a bloody knife, you’d still only expect it was for thoroughly benign reasons. Luckily, I met Bob within the very first few weeks of arriving in LA. I not only knew I had my lead, but it was the beginning of a beautiful friendship 

Trouble was, even though everyone recognized Bob’s face, he was not box-office at the time, and when the script began receiving attention, the pressure was on to cast a bigger name. Plus – as is common- it made more sense to make the pic for a decent budget so folk could walk away with a decent fee even if the pic tanked. This was when it clicked to me that a 5 million dollar film with people taking large upfront fees, is almost the same as a one million dollar film with everyone taking scale and percentages. With that bold, and naive notion in mind, I called every other actor up and asked if they could take scale so I could use Bob in the lead. To my utter surprise and delight, everyone – Dave Thewlis, Amanda Plummer, Fairuza Balk – and everyone else involved – said, yes. Amazing actors, wonderful people, dedicated artists – all focused on making the best film possible. I still remember that night. It changed everything. 

So, anyhow, I recalculated the budget with a producer friend of mine, Andrew Schuth, and took this crazy film, with a great cast for an unheard-of tiny budget, to Irvin Kershner, who in turn, took it to Nu Image, where the mixture of names, genre and budget convinced them to finance a totally fucked-up film. 

Now Nu Image mostly made low budget exploitation films and ran a hard-core, no-nonsense business – and I was an ‘artist’ trying to project a ‘vision’. My relationship with them was, therefore, complicated, mostly my own arrogant and fearful fault – What I must say, though, is that Avi Lerner, Boaz Davison, John Thompson and the rest of the Nu Image team never messed with my cut of the film, and they deserve a lot of thanks and respect for allowing such a film to be made – for any budget. The fact it ended up being chosen for Cannes among many other major Film Festivals also kinda blew a lot of people’s minds at the company (mine included), and I like to think it was helpful to Nu Image, too. I certainly remain grateful. 

As for how I approached directing the film – I grew up watching a lot of great movies, but I often felt I learned more from the ‘bad’ ones, mostly because there were so many elements I imagined how I might personally ‘improve’ if I was to have a go. As time went by, however, I began to see these ‘faults’ less as negatives, and more as unique character traits of the filmmakers themselves. To this day, I still love Fulci, Deodato, Lenzi and countless other directors as much for their moments that don’t quite work, as anything wonderful thing they’ve also succeeded in pulling off – a quality I find missing in pictures so well groomed and pre- visualized that personality is often forfeited for technique and spectacle. I’m not for bumper stickers, but I like the one that goes: We admire people for their strengths, but connect with them though their weaknesses. 

Consequently, if I was directing a scene in Perfekt, and knew how to make it work by emulating a scene from another film, I consciously threw the concept out and started again, until I could find an unexpected element of risk in every shot and every scene. Theory was, that some of this was gonna work, while other scenes may fail – but if the value system was consistent, and all my choices were distinctly my own, I might at least create a unique and intriguing total atmosphere – possibly full of faults but distinctly a consistent vision – which was what I always enjoyed most about the films I loved and remembered. They didn’t need to be perfect, so much as Perfekt

In keeping with the major themes of chance and fate, some elements also had to be completely surprising, while other elements had to remain almost infuriatingly predictable. 

That was only fair – the yin to the yang. Sorry (but not really) if that bothered some people. 

In the past, their have also been some other question about Perfekt I can maybe answer. 

No, I have never read The Dice Man, and it never played a part in the creation of the script. 

Although Perfekt preceded No Country For Old Men (both book and film) by several years, I have no idea if the Coen’s, or Cormack McCarthy, ever saw it, or drew inspiration from it. You’d have to ask them. I like the Coen Brothers’ work, however, so whatever, more power to them. 

 

“American Perfekt” (1997) on set.

 

Throughout your career, you have worked in what seems to be every position available. From writing and directing, to editing both film and sound, and beyond. With that I am curious to know what is your favorite aspect of filmmaking? If you were forced for one reason or another to only do one gig for the remainder of your career, what would it be? 

God, I love it all. Recording sound, photographing, editing, production design, special effects, the music. Except for acting (I don’t like being in front of the camera). Every facet of the process has something glorious and fascinating to offer. And it still kinda surprises me that so many directors don’t have more of a general knowledge (or even interest) of overall film production. The more you know, the more tools and skills you use to realize your vision, the less mistakes, and the more choices, you can make. Each of these skills are also simply a means to an end – that end being the finished film – so my interests in all of these facets probably simply comes under the heading of direction. Directing is probably where I’ll spend more of the future. Writing can take forever, and I have too many scripts already sitting in a drawer doing nothing as it is. I’m also very open to directing other people’s scripts. Budget or genre isn’t a factor. Only originality. I recently created a production company, Lionhart Films, specifically designed to make unusual films. The first film I directed for the company, Nasty, stars Robert Forster, and was dedicated to Kershner. 

If you were given the opportunity, as well as an unlimited budget, to write and direct the biopic of any legendary figure from world history, who would it be?

Sorry, don’t have anyone legendary I’d want to make a biopic about. 

My personal interests are far more insignificant and peripheral. I am drawn, however, to making a film about NY indie director Andy Milligan. Now there’s a filmmaker who fascinates me – on so many levels – and I am proud to say I probably own one of the world’s largest collection of Andy Milligan films – including mint 16mm prints of Legacy of Horror, and The Rats are Coming! The Werewolves Are Here!, a fact that will only impress about five people in the known universe, but still makes me giddy to think about. I imagine, however, the audience for such a pic would be pretty small. 

What does the future hold for you? Anything you would like to plug to our readers? 

Many new projects in development, or about to go into production. Too numerous to mention them all … 

A feature adaptation for Walter Mosley’s controversial novel Killing Johnny Fry produced by Walter Mosley (Devil in a Blue Dress) and Denise Grayson (The Social Network), an epic sci- fi TV series called The Fourth Kingdom produced by Vince Gerardis (Game of Thrones) and Todd Garner (Aquaman, Mortal Kombat), a paranoid political thriller set in 1930’s Paris cafe society called Fay White’s Book of Monsters exec produced by Matt Kennedy, a music documentary following David Bowie’s ex band as they cover and re-record classic Bowie track “Rock and Roll with Me”, and a short thriller I wrote and directed called Nasty, also produced with the great Denise Grayson through my new production company Lionhart Films starring Robert Forster, Lisa Pelikan, Aaron David Gleason and Lenny Von Dohlen. ‘Nasty’ is currently screening at festivals across the U.S. 

I also recently finished the scripts for Six Million Dollar Detective, a neo-noir detective story about a ageing detective who gets rebuilt by a bunch of low-end plastic surgeons, and thrown back onto the streets of Hollywood to finish off a case in spectacular fashion, and a giallo thriller called Clean Me about a late-night DJ who comes to the conclusion his new apartment is either haunted, or he’s sharing it with a cleanaholic madman who refuses to ever reveal themselves. 

The next studio feature film I develop, and will also direct, however, will most likely be The Flint Heart, a large budget, highly irreverent adult fantasy along the lines of Princess Bride from the book by Edon Philpot and Catherine Paterson (Bridge to Terabithia). 

And, of course, anyone out there with a new and interesting project they wanna run by me. I’m all ears and eyes … 

What was the last thing that made you smile? 

Well, that’s easy. Picking up my kid from school today – and watching them walk along the road towards my car. Oh, my God, you can’t beat that kinda love. Oh, and the 5k digital movie camera sitting on my work desk right now, complete with matte box, follow focus and a gorgeous set of prime lenses. Thrills me as much as the 16mm NPR I had sitting in my damp Sheffield apartment so many years ago when I was a student. Some things don’t change.

 

 

Being ever so kind as he is, Paul Chart was gracious enough to share a few photos from over the years from American Perfekt and Nasty, which were discussed in our interview. Please enjoy!

 

 American Perfkect

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nasty

 

Peter Rowe [Interview]

 

Today’s interview subject is a man who did one specific thing that initially made want to have him on the site. And oddly enough, it was an acting gig, which turns out to not really be his main gig. It’s actually Canadian filmmaking legend Peter Rowe! And the acting gig I am speaking of was also wildly specific, which was his portrayal of the late and brilliant Hunter S. Thompson in the docuseries Final 24. I will admit, it’s not the most glamorous interpretation of the final days of HST, but I was still so intrigued to ask the man who was tasked to portray the ailing Thompson in this series how that experience was to do so. So, I hit up Mr. Rowe and graciously enough he accepted our invite. Which is something we are always so grateful for here at TWS. Tomorrow, Feb. 20th, is actually the 15th anniversary of Hunter taking his own life, making many of the events that Rowe depicted on screen, 15 years ago today. It’s so hard to think about such a loss, but knowing it was Hunter’s choice should give us a bit of peace, I suppose.

And as I began to do a bit more research on this fella, I came to learn that Peter has done some amazing work in just about every field imaginable in the world of film and television. From writing and directing to special effects consulting and cinematography, there really isn’t anything that this man can’t do! For over 50 years, the 3-time Gemini Award nominated Peter Rowe has been bring so much joy to the world through his work, and we are so excited to be able to share a few words from him today. So Folks, please enjoy some wonderful words from the brilliant Peter Rowe!

 

******

 

What initially inspired you to get into the world of filmmaking? Was it something you had dreamt of doing since your youth, or did you happen to find yourself in this world one day?

There was very little local filmmaking going on in my youth. Instead I first worked in live theater – three seasons of Summer Stock theater in the U.S. and Canada as an apprentice and Assistant Stage Manager and Lighting Technician. There were no film schools at that time, except for UCLA, USC and the Lodz School in Poland, and since none of them were in the cards for me, I instead attended McMaster University  in Hamilton, where I pretended to study philosophy and in reality became film reviewer for the student newspaper, and then one of the founders of an underground filmmaking group we named the McMaster Film Board. We managed to scam some money together from the university to be able to make a number of films, some of which I directed, others I photographed. Our group attracted a number of budding actors and filmmakers, some of whom, such as Eugene Levy and Ivan Reitman went on to Hollywood fame and fortune. One of our sexy wilder efforts led to some notoriety, including a lead story in the big newspapers and on the CBC National News, which led me to…

 

What was your first paid gig in the world of entertainment? And were there any sort of lessons learned from this experience that still affects your work today?

My first job in the film biz was working as an assistant film editor and projectionist at the CBC. Realizing that if I stayed there it would be a very slow rise through the network, I left after three months, and then, with the help of my calling card underground experimental film made at McMaster, joined a wonderful film company / film co-op called Allan King Associates, run by iconic doc maker Allan King and his filmmaking partner Richard Leiterman. I got to work on many films there, and most especially got to produce and direct my first feature, which was titled The Neon Palace. From there I continued to work as a freelance filmmaker both on projects I initiated and ones I did for others. I’ve made over 190 films, including ten features, such as Treasure Island, with Jack Palance, The Best Bad Thing with George Takei and Lost!  with Ken Welsh, Helen Shaver and Michael Hogan. In the 80’s and 90’s I mostly did dozens of episodes of dramatic television series. In this century I mostly have done documentaries. My most notable was 49 episodes of the series  Angry Planet. In 2013 I wrote a book about it all titled Adventures in Filmmaking, that is available on Amazon. The book gets lots of great reviews, and so did most of the films.

 

 

I recently caught an acting performance you gave on the series Final 24 in which you portrayed a personal hero of the mine, the late Hunter S. Thompson. I am very curious as to how this experience was for you? What kind of research went into the process of becoming such a legendary figure?

Through my career on stage and in film I continued to dabble in acting. In 2006 I learned of the series Final 24 and that the producers were planning a one hour special on the last 24 hours of the life of Hunter S. Thompson. I auditioned for the lead part and got it. I simply researched the part by re-reading the books of his I had read, and reading the early ones (like The Rum Diaries) I hadn’t. It was generally a ball shooting the film. Snorting  cocaine (icing sugar), guzzling bourbon (apple juice), berating my “wife” and generally behaving like an asshole, improvising wild dialogue, shooting guns (blanks, but still fun) and blowing stuff up – what’s not to like? It was a strange shoot for me, because my own father had died in hospital the day before the first day of the film, and Thompson killed himself, he claimed, because he didn’t want to end up like his father, lying in a hospital with a dozen tubes stuck in him. I did it in tribute to my father, a writer himself, and though no fan of Thompson or television, was a big supporter of my filmmaking and a believer in the showbiz adage that the show must go on. The film is available on YouTube.

 

If you were handed the opportunity to create a biopic, with unlimited resources, of any legendary figure in Canadian history, who would it be? 

It isn’t a hypothetical question. For years I have been trying to make a film about the world’s first movie star, Canadian born actress Florence Lawrence. My film is not a biopic but rather a re-imagination of Lawrence’s life, based on the novel by William J. Mann, titled Biograph Girl. Instead of our story ending with a Hollywood suicide in the 1930s, as the real one did, our film imagines that she did not die but instead was rediscovered in the 1990s and then turned, by a down-on-his-luck documentary filmmaker into a star (of TV and tabloids) all over again. My partner on the project is Canadian star actress Jennifer Dale, who’ll play Lawrence. We’ve had fun doing about 15 drafts of the script. It’s a good one. Who knows, at this point, whether we’ll find the financing to make the film, but we keep working on it.

 

When you look back on a career spanning over 50 years in the business, what would you say you are the most proud of when you look back on it? Not one project in particular maybe, but your career as whole.

I am very pleased that in the sometimes shaky world of filmmaking I never had to “get a real job” and instead continued to keep working and have fun in a biz where every day is different from the last. I’m also pleased to have two daughters who have continued in related fields, one as the co-anchor of the evening news at WKBW-TV, in Buffalo, and the other making expedition films and teaching adventure filmmaking on National Geographic Society student expeditions. As for my own projects I’ve enjoyed almost all of them, but probably none more than filming adventurer George Kournounis as he hosted my series Angry Planet, filming in the most remote parts of 40 countries on all seven continents. Its available on Amazon Prime.

 

 

What does the future hold for you? Anything you would like to plug to our readers?

I’m focused these days on two things – painting – I paint mostly pop art work that I display in Toronto galleries and on my Instagram (peterrowepicsandpaint) and Facebook (peter.rowe.123276) sites, and writing. I am deep into a new book titled Music vs The Man, that is about the long-running contentious relationship between musicians, singers and bands, and the authorities – police, border guards, mayors, the FBI, the Kremlin, etc. Hope to soon have a publisher for it.

 

What was the last thing that made you smile?

Probably an episode of The Simpsons (over 30 years of brilliance) or maybe Jiminy Glick (Marty Short, also a McMaster alumni, is the greatest ever). Or maybe Colbert or one of the other late night comic geniuses. We live in a crazy age of politics that has led to a golden age of both comedy and journalism.

New Music Tuesday: Eamon Ra – Meat Bones Chemicals Electricity [Album]

 

Hello Folks! And welcome back to our latest (and far too infrequent) edition of New Music Tuesday. Today we are showcasing an absolutely brilliant singer/songwriter who is bringing the brilliant pop rock vibes of yesteryear back for your patient ears. It’s Eamon Ra, and hot damn if he doesn’t have a sound that you all should have been begging for over the last few years. This Emerald City legend is putting out his first solo album after so many years working with some of Seattle’s finest artists, as well as around the globe. Meat Bones Chemicals Electricity is actually a rather appropriate title (go figure, haha) for this scattered yet very organized feeling album. With blends of psychodelic 60’s rock with noticeable Folk centric core. And it’s all wonderful, Folks.

 

 

There are some things about this incredibly unique for our time album that will not surprise the avid music listener. And this is a compliment. Beautifully sung songs about sad thing, good thing, and all of the little messes we make in between. Eamon writes the hell out of a pop song that perfectly infiltrates lyrics into a signature sound. I say signature, because in this day and age, musicianship doesn’t seem to be a factor that anyone cares about any more. His sound harkens back to the 60’s when experimentation was key, yet stuck to a folk rock format that was recognizable and delightful. Thus to say, Eamon Ra is a musician still stuck on the idea of creating a great sound for the sake of great art. And we truly appreciate him for it.

While the entire track list is solid, I feel in my heart of heart’s that nothing encapsulates the sound that might very well define Eamon Ra himself like ” Simple But So Complicated”. It’s not the final track on the album, but I truly feel as though it real sums the entire concept of Meat Bones Chemicals Electricity as a whole. The eccentricity and the catchiness collides to form a beautiful cloud of sound that is absolutely delightful.

So check it out, Folks! I know it may feel like it’s impossible to find new music to get blown away by, but if you dig deep enough, I promise you it is out there. And Eamon Ra’s Meat Bones Chemicals Electricity is sure to be exactly what you are looking for.

 

Meat Bones Chemicals Electricity will be available on March 6th wherever you purchase great music.

 

Harris Goldberg [Interview]

 

Folks, we are kicking the week off right with an interview subject who is an absolute legend in the world of film and television, especially (but not limited to) the genre of comedy. It’s Harris Goldberg, Everyone! Harris may be best known for penning the screenplays to modern classic comedies like Deuce Bigalow: Male Gigolo, The Master of Disguise, and the semi-autobiographical comedy-drama, Numb. He also has a story credit alongside our old friend Mitch Rouse for his work on the hilarious buddy comedy we know and love known as Without A Paddle. He is a damn fine writer and filmmaker, who we are so honored to be able to steal some time from to tell us about his career thus far, and what the future holds for him.

So Folks, without any further babbling on my part, please find some wonderful words from the great Harris Goldberg!

 

What initially inspired you to get into the world of screenwriting? was it something you have had as a passion since your youth, or did you just happen to find yourself in this world one day?

My older brother was/is a very successful screenwriter/producer. I witnessed his journey to Los Angeles and two back to back hit movies at the time (Meatballs & Stripes). That inspired me to follow in his ‘quite large’ and daunting footsteps. I had also been doing some stand-up at a very early age.

What was your very first paid gig in the world of entertainment? and were there any sort of lessons learned from this experience that still affects your work today?

My first paid gig came very fast. within weeks of being in L.A. It was a writing assignment for National Lampoon and producer Matty Simmons (who had produced Animal House & Vacation).  After I got the job, a more experienced writer friend in town said, “Don’t get too cocky. It’s not usually like this. The dips are so low you’ll need a shovel to dig yourself out.” I didn’t believe him. I thought he was just a bit bitter. Ten movies later, I realized exactly what he meant.

You made your feature film directorial debut in 2007 with the brilliant film Numb, which I heard was quite a cathartic experience for you on a personal level? Can you tell our readers a bit about the making of this film and how the story came to be?

Before Numb I was known as a broad comedy guy. I was branded in the Adam Sandler, SNL camps of comedy. the stress of L.A. was taking a toll. I was dealing with some profound anxiety, depression, etc… as a way to settle myself, I began to write a screenplay about the experience. Before I knew it, I was writing a screenplay – a screenplay I did not intend to show anyone really.  When I completed it, I was almost embarrassed to show it. I slipped it to a producer of note I had worked with before. He called back the next day and wanted to make it. Matthew Perry came on board in a big way and I was suddenly directing this very personal, autobiographical story.

 

 

While you have done so many amazing projects and I would like to ask about them all, but i feel like we would be going on forever. so, i would like to ask about just one more of your films that i truly loved as a kid, and that would be 2002’s The Master of Disguise. i have been a huge fan of dana carvey for as long as i can remember, so i may be biased. but, i am curious to know how this story was developed? what was it that made you want to create this very zany story?

Adam Sandler & Sony asked if I would write a  feature film for/with Dana. I was a fan of his as well. Same producers of Deuce Bigalow, which I had done in ’98 I think it was. I met Dana and we really hit it off. He could go into so many characters so quickly, I thought taking advantage of this skill could make an entertaining picture, as well as tap into his comfort zone for characterization. The first draft was a hilarious, R-rated comedy we were both pretty ecstatic about. The producer called us the next day with, “You have redefined comedy,” so he must have liked it. In any event, the studio executive in charge of the project hated it, wanted a PG version of the story to tap into the massive youth market. I assumed the project was dead. On a flight up to mill valley, where Dana lives, I came up with the idea of this Disguise Master, and a tamer storyline I thought would appeal to the studio executive. Dana slowly got on board and we wrote what is now the movie.

If you were handed an unlimited budget & free range to create the biopic of any famous figure in world history, who would it be?

Actor, Steve McQueen. I was very friendly with his wife of 15 years who told me incredible stories about this mercurial, charismatic icon. I’ve always been a McQueen fan. In particular, I thought I could really show who this man was and why he had such an impact.

What does the future hold for you? anything you would like to plug to our readers?

I’m currently doing a Sci-Fi thriller for Miramax.

What was the last thing that made you smile?

A dream last night where, for 24 hours, everyone in L.A. were honest, kind and not trying to rip your head off.

Saturday Special: A Perfect Host [Film]

 

“Four friends rent an isolated lake house for a weekend getaway. While the dramas of the friends’ relationships unfold, they are continually interrupted by the home’s owner: a health-obsessed bodybuilder named Tad. Throughout the group’s short stay, Tad’s seemingly affable gestures take an eerie and sinister twist, turning their dream vacation into a nightmare. Mystery entangles this tale that questions the blind acceptance of modern-day practices.” – October Coast PR

 

******

Happy Saturday, Folks! Today we are showcasing a suspense thriller for the ages. A Perfect Host is an intriguing film littered with suspense and ultimate pay off that is simply not to be missed. With some twists and turns, I will decree here and now that whatever you are expecting to experience whilst watching this modern gem of a horror film, you will definitely receive more than expected. Filmmaker Chad Werner hit the proverbial nail on the head in terms of keeping the suspense tight, while keeping the attitude a bit light and somewhat comedic at times. He’s an obvious mastermind of his craft and I am very excited to see what the future holds for him.

 

Brady Burelson Johnson is absolutely incredible in is portrayal of the film’s protagonist, Tad. Just superb. And might I had that the name Tad says so much about the character he is playing. I sincerely cannot think of a better name for this somewhat charming psychopath. KoKo Marshall is also a stand out performer in this wonderfully casted film that I recommend to anyone obsessed with great horror and suspense projects. A Perfect Host is simply brilliant. Check it out!

 

A Perfect Host is available now on DVD and VOD.

 

 

 

Chelsea Gilson [Interview]

 

Hello Folks! We have a wonderful interview to share with you all today. We have the inspirational and immensely talented actress, traveler, yoga instructor, and so much more. It’s Chelsea Gilson, Everyone! In 2019 alone, Chelsea worked on two of our favorite films of the year, which will be discussed below. She is a star on the rise and has an incredible future. We are so excited to have her join the TWS alum. She’s incredibly kind with her time and just an overall incredible soul. So please enjoy some brilliant responses from this incredible performer. Enjoy!

 

******

 

What inspired you to get into the world of entertainment? Was it something that has been ingrained in you since you were a child, or did you happen to find yourself in this world one day?

I live to create.  There is nothing that fuels me quite as much as an opportunity to pour myself into a role and become rooted in a new character.  I wouldn’t say I always dreamed of becoming an actress or television host – or travel blogger or yoga teacher for that matter –  but I always had an inclination for the limelight. I was a pageant kid who realized quite young that the energy of being on stage, of being seen and heard, it’s pretty damn liberating.

What was your very first paid gig in the world of entertainment? And were there any sort of lessons learned from this experience that still affect your work today?

I can’t recall my first paid entertainment gig, but my first big break was when I booked a show on Travel Channel called Scambushed.  I can vividly remember getting the call that I was selected as one of four hosts for the show.  I was driving home from a fitness shoot, and I had to pull over to catch my breath – I was seriously too excited to drive!  That experience gave me the self-confidence boost I needed to pursue a career in this crazy whirlwind of a business.

We are huge fans of the universe that the legendary Kevin Smith has brought to the screen, having interviewed literally dozens of folks from this world. Including yourself! I understand you can be heard the most recent installment, Jay and Silent Bob Reboot. I am curious to know how your experience was working on a Kevin Smith project? Was there anything that set it apart from the variety of other projects you have worked on?

I only worked as voiceover on Jay & Silent Bob Reboot, so I never got any set time with Kevin!  Everything was recorded in a sound studio 🙂 Voiceover is such a fun avenue of the entertainment world I’m just now starting to explore.  I’d really love to try my voice (see what I did there!) at an animated movie one day, how cool would that be?!

 

 

Another incredible project you worked on was the brilliant Dolemite Is My Name, which was high on our list of the best films of 2019. Same sort of question. How was your experience working on this incredible film? And what was it about this legendary story that made you want to be a part of it?

There were so many world-class actors on Dolemite Is My Name, I’d be lying if I said I wasn’t star-struck on set.  I really loved how everyone was so professional during the takes – never missing lines, conscious of their blocking, grounded in their character.  But the second the director yelled cut it felt like one big party, with everyone cracking jokes and laughing it up like a backyard bbq.  It really was a dream experience and I’m so grateful I had a small part in such an iconic film.

If you were handed the opportunity to create & star in the biopic of any legendary figure in American history, who would it be? 

I’m smitten with Dolly Parton and would love to give tribute to her remarkable life story.  She is beyond talented and so fiercely grounded in her sense of self, it would be an honor to walk in her shoes!

What does the future hold for you? Anything you would like to plug to our readers?

This week I’m headed to Temecula to film a movie.  I can’t share any details yet, but if it turns out half as good as the script, you’ll be hearing about it soon!  Other than that, I stay busy blogging away at www.travelingfig.com, stop by anytime to connect or collaborate!  You can also find me on IG at @chelseagilson and @organictravel  & on Twitter @chelseagilson

What was the last thing that made you smile?

I am obnoxiously optimistic, so it’s pretty rare that I don’t have a smile plastered on my face.  But if I had to say the last thing that evoked a big grin, I would pick this morning when I was teaching yoga.  I always cheese during the whole class – I’m just so grateful for the opportunity to share the practice with my students!

Allen Strickland Williams [Interview]

 

Hello Folks! Happy Wednesday to you all! We have an incredible interview for you all today. We’ve had some wonderful comedians on the site in the past years, and today is absolutely no exception! Today we have some amazing responses from the brilliant Allen Strickland Williams! For comedy fans, Allen is a true household name, and one of the best in the game. For those sad few who aren’t quite familiar with Williams and his unique and brilliant brand of comedy, you are in for damn treat! You’re seriously going to LOVE him. He’s been hard at work with a brand new series that we will all hopefully get to see for ourselves soon! Until then catch him at a live show! Listen to his podcast The Male Gaze he does with Steve Hernandez each Monday! And because I know our readership is loud and proud in our homeland of the Pacific Northwest, he’s coming your way in March! More information below! Be there!

So Folks, please enjoy some wonderful words from the brilliant Allen Strickland Williams!

 

******

 

When did you first discover that you are a hilarious human being, and that you wanted to make people laugh for a living?

I ran a semi-successful blog when I was still in the womb called Baby Speak. Got some traction around the third trimester. Once the influencer opportunities started rolling in I thought, “Goo goo gah gah. Maybe I got a shot at this thing.”

What was your first paid gig in the world of entertainment? And were there any sort of lessons learned from this experience that still affect your work to this day?

Besides getting paid 20 bucks here and there for some live stand-up spots, I somehow got a gig to write an entire season of an animated show about a dog who, get this, was a little bit of a potty mouth. I wrote an outline and a bunch of episodes about this dirty—and when I say dirty I mean DIRTY—dog. I think the dog’s name was Pussy? Thank god it never got made. At the time it was a lot of money to get all at once, the most I’d ever seen on a check with my name on it. But, it took me forever to get paid, and the money went away pretty fast. That was a lesson in how work can come from anywhere, there’s a lot of bad shit that needs writing, you can get paid even if something doesn’t get made, and that one gig or check isn’t gonna change your life. Which sucks. Because all I want to do is get paid in one of those big checks and take it out to the desert, never to be seen again.

 

We always like to ask comedians who make their way across the country one thing: What are so unsuspectingly wonderful places for comedy? What are some of those “fly-over” cities that simply don’t get the credit they deserve as wonderful places to perform stand up?

DAVENPORT, IOWA. I cannot stress this enough. Daniel Bush and Sean Moeller have put on some of the best shows I’ve ever done anywhere. And it’s a beautiful town, no matter the season.

 

 

I recently heard you on our friend Amy Miller’s podcast, Who’s Your God?, talking about an upcoming project you are working on entitled Unmatched. Without giving away too much, can you tell us a bit about this project? What sort of hilarity should our readers expect to see when the show is finally made?

It’s a show about a world where everyone is monogamous because an app’s algorithm can match you to your perfect soulmate. But the algorithm isn’t perfect, and some people can’t be matched, so they’re living non-monogamously in a world that’s completely built for everybody else.

 

If you were handed the opportunity, with unlimited resources, to write and produce the biopic of any well known figure in American history, who would it be? Why?

George Washington. And I’d just make him look like an idiot who got really lucky.

 

What else does the future hold for you? Anything you would like to plug to our readers?

I’ll be headlining in Washington, D.C. at the Drafthouse Comedy Theater on 2/7 and 2/8, and at the Funhouse Lounge in Portland, OR on 3/20 and 3/21.

 

What was the last thing that made you smile?

Remembering I had my weed vape at my office.

 

 

Craig Hamann [Interview]

 

Hot damn do we have a good interview for you all today, Folks! We are kicking February off right with some words from an absolute legend in the world of film. It’s Craig Hamann, Everyone! Craig has been involved in filmmaking for almost 40 years, and is actually one of the reasons you may know the likes of one Quentin Tarantino. That’s right, Craig worked alongside QT on his very first film, My Best Friend’s Birthday, which has a making of story like no other, that you simply must learn about. In the interview Craig will talk about a great book by Andrew J. Rausch regarding the making of this film. And while I have not read it myself, I plan to. And if Craig is willing to co-sign on this venture, then I am totally down to do so as well.

Beyond the one memorable venture, Hamann has worked on many other awe-inspiring projects, including working with some of our old friends at Full Moon Entertainment, which he will tell us about in his answers below. He has an exciting new series in the works that we hope gets to see the proverbial light of day soon. And overall, he’s just a genuinely kind man and we are so grateful that he could take some time out of his busy schedule to share a few answers with us here today.

So Folks, please enjoy some wonderful words from the great Craig Hamann!

 

******

 

What initially inspired you to get into the world of filmmaking? Was it something you had dreamt of doing since your youth, or did you happen to find yourself in this world one day?

Two things inspired me. The first happened when I was maybe five or six years old. I always liked seeing movies, even when I was that young. As a result, my parents would take me to matinees on weekends. One day they took me to a double feature with Bela Lugosi in Dracula and Boris Karloff in Frankenstein. I was immediately hooked on horror and genre films, and the possibility of one day writing for film.

The second inspiration came while I was attending Eastern Michigan University, which is a good writing school. I just happened to notice screenwriting was being taught and so I took the class. I loved it. It completely erased any doubts I had about getting into the film business.

What was your first paid gig in the world of entertainment? And were there any sort of lessons learned from this experience that still affects your work today?

The first paid jobs were uncredited rewrites for a few low budget indie films. A couple didn’t even get produced. I also did some martial arts fighting stunts in a couple films best left forgotten. But my first paid gig where my name was seen was acting in The Tomb, directed by Fred Olen Ray. The experience itself was dope. Another big plus was I met Sybil Danning during the filming. She was drop dead sexy and such a nice person. During the shoot, I spent as much time as possible talking with Sybil about the independent film industry as I could.

If there is one thing working on The Tomb  taught me, it’s filmmaking is a job. A fun job. But still a job. Everyone is working hard to complete the shots on schedule. 

 

 

A number of years ago, you created a film with Quentin Tarantino entitled My Best Friend’s Birthday in the early days of both of your careers. I am curious as to how this relationship came about? I believe I’ve heard that you originally began the project? How did this all play out?

A great book by Andrew J. Rausch recently came out titled My Best Friend’s Birthday: The Making Of A Quentin Tarantino Film. It really goes into depth about the film. Quentin, Roger Avary and myself all participated in interviews for it. I highly recommend it to anyone interested in the film. 

Quentin and I had become close friends at the James Best Acting School. We decided one day to basically hold our noses and take a plunge into making a film. It was a trying but rewarding time in our lives. Of course, the best part is I got to work with Quentin. That’s an experience I will always cherish. As for me originally beginning the project, make no mistake, despite what some people have said, Quentin and I originated and made the film together. We worked hard at it. As Quentin likes to say, it was his film school. I agree with that sentiment. It was the only sort of filmmaking school I ever attended.

I also like the idea of simply saying, “We’re gonna make a movie.” We didn’t know at all what we were in for and we didn’t really know what we were doing while we were filming. It was trial by fire. But what a learning experience! 

By the way, the camera we used to shoot the movie was a 16mm Bolex that Fred Olen Ray lent to us. He did us a real solid. I’ll never forget it.

I came across something pretty interesting whilst scanning the internet that I was wondering you could give some detail about. I understand that you reunited with Quentin a few years later as a consultant on Pulp Ficiton. I am curious to know what kind of consulting work you provided to the film? And how was your experience working on this project?

I am a former substance abuser. That’s a fancy way of saying I was a drug addict many years ago while living in Detroit. I talked in depth with John Travolta about the heroin use in the film and I met with Quentin and Uma Thurmond to talk about her overdose scene. I also talked with Quentin about what the overdose would look like. He did a superb job with it.

I would come to the set and always end up in John Travolta’s trailer talking about film, life, whatever. He’d make us iced tea and we would just sit and shoot the breeze. A couple times Quentin joined us for lunch. Quentin also had me present while he shot Christopher Walken’s incredible “watch” scene. It was amazing. Walken is blow away amazing as an actor. And Quentin wrote a brilliant scene.

My apologies for all the Quentin praise here, but I find the guy’s talent to be astonishing. He has to be looked at as one of the greatest signature writer/directors to ever grace the big screen. Of course, yeah, I’m a bit biased.

We’ve spoken with quite a few folks who have worked in the Full Moon Entertainment world, especially writers, which you did yourself in 1993 with Dollman vs. Demonic Toys. We love horror films around here at TWS, so I am curious to know about your experience working on this very specific type of horror camp-like genre?

My buddy Courtney Joyner introduced me to Charlie Band. We hit it off well. I ended up writing Dollman vs. Demonic Toys. It was great writing for Full Moon because of their colorful approach to films, but equally fun was having two friends on  board with Courtney as an associate producer and Tim Thomerson in the lead. 

One project I really was hoping to do with Full Moon was going to be their version of H.P. Lovecraft’s The Shadow Over Innsmouth. It didn’t happen. I believe they had difficulty securing the rights to that one at the time.

 

 

What does the future hold for you? Anything you would like to plug to our readers?

Right now I’m excited about a project called Smokers, which I’m doing with my good friend Sam Dobbins. Sam is a smart and experienced actor/producer. We’ve put a lot of time and hard work into this one. To be honest the project is fairly fresh off the presses, but it’s ready to start being shopped. One of the reasons I’m so crazy about this action/horror/revenge story is because of the streaming TV shows on Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, and Shudder (among others). We have 10 episodes already written and a complete story/character bible for Smokers. Admittedly, it’s gritty stuff, very violent, but it’s an intriguing plot with wonderfully offbeat characters. I firmly believe the cross pollination of genres in the story would be fascinating to viewers.

What was the last thing that made you smile?

Here, right now answering the interview questions. It brought back a lot of cool memories. Thank you for doing that for me.

2020 Oscar Preview with Chris & Ron [Exclusive]

 

Introduction from Mr. Eaves:

What is the difference between a best film and our favorite film? How do we talk about cinema? We build definitions and debate parameters in order to categorize but in doing so can risk sacrificing the unique and personal experience of filmgoing.

I remember watching The Criterion Blu-ray release of Noah Baumbach’s Frances Ha (2012) several years ago. A black and white eccentric coming of age film set to a New York backdrop starring Greta Gerwig. While I absolutely hated this film upon first viewing there was also something that latched onto me. I unwantedly spent the next few days thinking about Gerwig’s performance. While eccentric it oozed this humanistic energy. The following week I had to revisit the film to figure out why I was still thinking about a movie I thought I disliked. By the ending credits, I had completely transitioned my feelings on the film. While I cannot explain this change of disposition, I can acknowledge that change did occur.

While Frances Ha still rests neatly on my movie shelf I have never sat down to watch the film a third time. Mostly driven by a fear of my second joyful experience reverting to my original. Film is a powerful medium. It is a mighty empathy machine capable of changing perspective and in that is a very personal experience.

What is a best film and what is a favorite film?

 

 

Introduction from Mr. Trembath:

The Irishman was lame. Joker was an incel manifesto, but Joaquin was great. Greta Gerwig was robbed. The Lion King was just an animated pile of dog shit. If I were you, I would vote for Chris.

 

******

So Folks, reach out to either Chris or Ron via social media, wherever you would like, and let us know which team you are on

The pointing system works as follows:

Correct “Want to Win” = 0.5 points

Correct “Going to Win” = 1.0 points

So tell us what you think, and if you choose the winner, you are entered into a pool to win an exceptionally mediocre prize of the finest Korean bootlegs from 2012-2013 (and before), a copy of Children of Mercy: Tales and Teachings From the World of Independent Music, and more!

And after you have picked your team, come back here and bump the winners against our choices, and wait for word from one of us that you are big winner! It’s that easy, Folks!

Let’s have some fun!

 

******

 

 

BEST PICTURE

“Ford v Ferrari”

“The Irishman”

“Jojo Rabbit”

“Joker”

“Little Women”

“Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood”

“Marriage Story”

“Parasite”

“1917”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: A technical achievement of the cinematic art form but should not be limited to this sole accomplishment. Presented as a single in real-time take, 1917 uses its form as a direct choice to enhance the emotional resonance of its larger themes. While The Academy has nominated many great films, the Academy also has ignored many others. Parasite continues to be a film I think about often. Depending on when I am asked, I could change my answer over to Parasite or Little Women.

My Nominations for Best Film in order of Preference.

The Last Blackman in San Francisco
1917
Parasite
Little Women
Uncut Gems
Waves
The Lighthouse
Dolemite is My Name
Marriage Story

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood. Look, I’ve seen 4 of the 9, and I loved 2 of them. And as a lifelong (almost) Quentin Tarantino fan, it really behooves me to pick this film that I really did love. Although, I have the feeling that I probably would have chosen Jojo Rabbit because it seems so damn great. But, QT for life.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Same as above.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: 1917. This was not one of the 4 that I even saw, but I honestly feel like it is the safe bet. This year actually feels like we may be reverting to the old days (not in a good way) and we may not see many surprises. So, I’m gonna pick this one for my buddy Chris. You’re welcome, Chris.

 

 

 

ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE

Kathy Bates, “Richard Jewell”

Laura Dern, “Marriage Story”

Scarlett Johansson, “Jojo Rabbit”

Florence Pugh, “Little Women”

Margot Robbie, “Bombshell”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: 

Scarlett Johansson, “Jojo Rabbit” – Taika Waititi crafted a whimsical farce of Nazi Germany. Waititi walks the line in his use of comedy to express hopefulness in direct contradiction to the worst of what humanity has to offer. Waititi was able to accomplish this through his actors especially Johansson’s mother role as the most grounded of the film’s characters capturing many heartwarming and authentic portrayals of motherhood and a general sense of hope. Without Johansson, I’m unsure Jojo Rabbit works.

My Nominations for Best Supporting Actress in order of Preference.

Scarlett Johansson – Jojo Rabbit
Park So-dam – Parasite
Zhao Shuzhen – The Farewell
Jennifer Lopez – Hustlers
Billie Lourd – Booksmart

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: Laura Dern, “Marriage Story”. I know this seems like an obvious choice, and a cheap trick to score some points, but this lady fucking EARNED it. This was one of those performances that I absolutely knew for a fact was going to end up in this silly award show, and it is well deserved.

 

 

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Laura Dern, “Marriage Story” – Dern is top-level acting. She is wonderful in everything she does. Dern’s character is memorable playing the role of the possible dubious motivated lawyer for Johansson. For me, the role fills more plot required then character driven.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Laura Dern, “Marriage Story”. Same as above.

 

 

ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE

Tom Hanks, “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood”

Anthony Hopkins, “The Two Popes”

Al Pacino, “The Irishman”

Joe Pesci, “The Irishman”

Brad Pitt, “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: 

Brad Pitt, “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood” – Brad Pitt is consistently amazing. Although, I consider Pitt’s character a co-lead to DiCaprio and not supporting. Both Pitt and DiCaprio’s characters have their own unique arcs throughout the film. Joe Pesci should also be mentioned as he came out of retirement for The Irishman playing a far more reserved character then he is known for bringing this softness and introspection.

My Nominations for Best Supporting Actor in order of Preference.

William Defoe – The Lighthouse
Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood – Brad Pitt
Shia LaBeouf – Honey Boy
Joe Pesci – The Irishman
Song Kang-ho – Parasite

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: Brad Pitt, “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood”. There is no question. If we are going to celebrate this film for acting, it has to be Brad. Everyone was wonderful, but Brad was absolutely fantastic. 

 

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Brad Pitt, “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood” – SEE ABOVE!

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Brad Pitt, “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood”. Same as above.

 

FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM

South Korea, “Parasite”

Spain, “Pain and Glory”

France, “Les Misérables”

North Macedonia, “Honeyland”

Poland, “Corpus Christi”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: South Korea, “Parasite” – This is a difficult choice between Parasite and Pain and Glory. These films could not be more different in presentation while remaining both so incredibly cinematically satisfying. Parasite brings this bizarre genre approach to social issues which I would not want to ruin for anyone who has yet to see the film, while Pain and Glory is a very complex expression of a man’s journey of accomplishments and failures. Pain and Glory is Antonia Bandera’s best work. Ideally Parasite would win Best Directing or Best Film allowing Pain and Glory to win Best International Film. I cannot see the Academy going that direction.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: South Korea, “Parasite”. No real basis for this pick, it just happens to be the one film that seemed interesting to me and I will probably watch later. And I just love South Korea. 

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: South Korea, “Parasite” – SEE ABOVE!

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: South Korea, “Parasite”. If it’s in the Best Picture category, it wins this one. No questions.

 

DOCUMENTARY (SHORT)

“In the Absence”

“Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (If You’re a Girl)”

“Life Overtakes Me”

“St. Louis Superman”

“Walk Run Cha-Cha”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (If You’re a Girl)” – I wish it was not so difficult to see these films. As of writing this piece I have not seen any of these nominated films. One week before Awards Night is not a proper release for the general public. If you wait so late to put these films in a theater at least find a way to have them available on VOD. The home theater is what I prefer but not being able to watch these films at all is a far worse choice.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “St. Louis Superman”. I haven’t seen any of the shorts, but this one seemed the most up my alley. And St. Louis is a great city.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Learning to Skateboard in a Warzone (If You’re a Girl)” – SEE ABOVE!

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Life Overtakes Me”. I’ve actually heard of this one. That’s really it.

 

DOCUMENTARY FEATURE

“American Factory”

“The Edge of Democracy”

“Honeyland”

“For Sama”

“The Cave”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN:“American Factory” – There is not a lot of escapism in these documentaries. These nominations reflect the sense of the world right now. Free Solo last year felt exciting and gripping and felt of human accomplishment. This year feels more painful and sorrowful. American Factory has the Netflix and the Obama power push.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “The Edge of Democracy”. I did only happen to see two of these, and yes they were the Netflix ones. I really did dig this film though. I can’t confirm that it is better than any of the others, but I do know that this shit was inspiring in a way. Also American Factory was corporate propaganda, plain and simple.

 

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN:  “American Factory” – SEE ABOVE!

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “The Edge of Democracy”. Same as above.

 

ORIGINAL SONG

“I’m Standing With You,” “Breakthrough”

“Into the Unknown,” “Frozen II”

“Stand Up,” “Harriet”

“(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again,” “Rocketman”

“I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away,” “Toy Story 4”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: 

“(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again,” “Rocketman” – Taron Egerton sings his own songs. He acts just as good or better than Rami Malek who won for best actor in 2019. Now, this is not the section for best Actors, this is clearly the best song of the nominations. Glasgow from Wild Rose completes that film. How could this song be missed?

My Nominations for Best Original Song in order of Preference.

“Glasgow (No Place Like Home)” – “Wild Rose”
“(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again,” – “Rocketman”

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again,” “Rocketman”. While I do love this song, I am really only picking it because I love when songs from non-animated films win this award. It brings a weird thrill to my simple heart.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again,” “Rocketman” – SEE ABOVE!

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again,” “Rocketman”. It was a wildly successful biopic about one of our most beloved musicians. I see this being a trend for the future.

 

ANIMATED FEATURE FILM

“How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World”

“I Lost My Body”

“Klaus”

“Missing Link”

“Toy Story 4”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN:  “Missing Link” – I am an unabashed sucker for Claymation. I absolutely love this technique and style. Made by the local production house outside of Portland Oregon too. This is all subjective and my bias should be known.

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Toy Story 4”. I want this for spiteful reasons if I’m being honest. Let Pixar get their 10th win, and let the Toy Story franchise, which started it all, finally be at rest.

 

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Toy Story 4” – Pixar is a juggernaut. Their worst movies are the equivalent to most other animation studios’ best movies. How the magic of Toy Story has lasted I do not know but am happy it has as a series that is completely cross-generational now without transitioning into the Direct to VOD cheap money grab movie model. What great stewardship of this perfect collection of films.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Toy Story 4”. Same as above.

 

ADAPTED SCREENPLAY

“The Irishman”

“Jojo Rabbit”

“Little Women”

“The Two Popes”

“Joker”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “Little Women” – Greta Gerwig is an auteur. It is a shame to have not been nominated for Best Director. This will drive the vote to Gerwig for adapted screenplay. Thich is also completely deserving in how Gerwig can modernize an adaptation that has seen so many previous attempts. The construction of the story is a clear standout to pull new themes and character emotions from a well-known source.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Jojo Rabbit”. I feel like this is the most original of the bunch, even though I have not seen the film. I have a deep-rooted love for the screenplay categories, and I feel like I have a pretty good gauge of how these things go. Or not. Who knows?

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Little Women” – SEE ABOVE!

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Jojo Rabbit”. Same as above.

 

ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY

“Marriage Story”

“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”

“Parasite”

“Knives Out”

“1917”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “Parasite” – Parasite is one of the most original screenplays of the year. Marriage Story and Once Upon a Time in… Hollywood are two of the best-written screenplays of the year.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”. Again, I only saw 2 of these films. I truly believe 1917 is out for sure, as we haven’t seen a war movie win in this category in, well, forever. These films are appreciated as a visual stimulation, but not as a story itself. And I believe that the Academy is not beyond giving QT awards for writing for 3 of his last 4 films. I think they will take pride in it.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Once Upon a Time in… Hollywood” – Tarantino is one of the most unique screenwriters of film.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”. Same as above.

 

ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE

Antonio Banderas, “Pain and Glory”

Leonardo DiCaprio, “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood”

Adam Driver, “Marriage Story”

Joaquin Phoenix, “Joker”

Jonathan Pryce, “The Two Popes”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: 

Antonio Banderas, “Pain and Glory” – Antonia Banderas is an amazing actor. This is also Bandera’s best work. Banderas crafts a human with all his accomplishments and flaws. This is a stacked year for Best Leading Actor and a huge miss for lacking a nomination for Eddie Murphy.

My Nominations for Best Actor in order of Preference:

Pain and Glory – Antonio Banderas
Adam Sandler – Uncut Gems
Joaquin Phoenix – Joker
Adam Driver – Marriage Story
Eddie Murphy – Dolomite is My Name

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: Joaquin Phoenix, “Joker”. I know that I should probably go with Leo on this one, but I have to admit that Joaquin gave it his all to this portrayal. It’s definitely the most unique of the bunch, and I actually saw 4 out of 5 of these performances! The film was mediocre at best, but Joaquin’s performance was undeniably outstanding.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Joaquin Phoenix, “Joker” – Phoenix is one of the best actors of all time. For better or worse he gives himself over to whatever role he is taking on. Phoenix elevates Joker through his performance.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Joaquin Phoenix, “Joker”. Same as above.

 

ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE

Cynthia Erivo, “Harriet”

Scarlett Johansson, “Marriage Story”

Saoirse Ronan, “Little Women”

Renée Zellweger, “Judy”

Charlize Theron, “Bombshell”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: 

Saoirse Ronan, “Little Women” – Ronan and Gerwig are meant to work together. They each bring out so much in each other’s craft. Little Women is an adaptation of the book 152 years removed but Saoirse Ronan’s portrayal of Jo feels complete with nuance and complexity. Scarlett Johansson’s work in Marriage Story, meant completely as positive, is a wonderful portrayal a complex human.

My Nominations for Best Actress in order of Preference.

Jessie Buckley – Wild Rose
Elisabeth Moss – Her Smell
Awkwafina – The Farewell
Saoirse Ronan – Little Women
Lupita Nyong’o – US

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: Cynthia Erivo, “Harriet”. Never saw it, but for the sake of the legendary CIA agent Harriet Tubman, I have to cast my vote for Cynthia.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Renée Zellweger, “Judy” – Renee Zellweger acting elevates a fine film. Renee Zellweger is Judy in mannerisms and look – thank you makeup team!

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Charlize Theron, “Bombshell”. Liberal elites most likely make up 98% of the Oscar judges, so this seems like a clear shot. Controversy sells. Also Charlize is probably due for an Oscar, although I am unclear as to why.

 

DIRECTOR

Martin Scorsese, “The Irishman”

Quentin Tarantino, “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”

Bong Joon-ho, “Parasite”

Sam Mendes, “1917”

Todd Phillips, “Joker”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: 

Bong Joon-ho, “Parasite” – Greta Gerwig is an auteur and deserved a nomination. Her ability to balance personal, social and interpersonal conflicting relationships across the runtime of Little Women is a feat. Bong Joon-ho accomplishes his own achievements of depicting social plight and family turmoil that hit both the pathos of the characters but also the entertainment value of a genre film. His style blends the best of both worlds into a unique artistic vision.

My Nominations for Best Director in order of Preference.

The Safdie Brothers – Uncut Gems
Bong Joon-ho – Parasite
Greta Gerwig – Little Women
Joe Talbot – The Last Black Man in San Francisco
Sam Mendes – 1917

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: Quentin Tarantino, “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”. I know it is asking a lot, as he already as 3 Oscars for writing, but I would really like QT to be appreciated for his visual storytelling as well. Please?

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Bong Joon-ho, “Parasite” – Rolling the dice and playing OSCARS Politics here. Paradise while deserving to win the best picture well be kept in the best Internal Category. But I think the Academy still wants to give Bong Joon-ho a win.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: Sam Mendes, “1917”. As far as a good looking film goes, I’d be willing to admit, without even having seen it, that 1917 is probably the best out there right now. Mendes and cinematographer Roger Deakins are a shoe-in.

 

PRODUCTION DESIGN

“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”

“The Irishman”

“1917”

“Jojo Rabbit”

“Parasite”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood” – Hollywood of 1969 is very recent. Most of the featured locations still exist but not as they once did. The level of detail applied to the period recreated is astonishing. The film functions as a time capsule to the transitional period of old Hollywood and the new wave of American Cinema.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”. This film was amazing to look at. It was extremely transformative to another era, and I alway appreciate that look in a film.

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917” – A technical achievement in production design across multiple set pieces.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917”. So much work went into making this film work, I imagine. It’s probably worthy of all the technical awards.

 

CINEMATOGRAPHY

“1917”

“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”

“The Irishman”

“Joker”

“The Lighthouse”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: 

“The Lighthouse” – I will take any and every chance to call out Joe Talbot’s “The Last Black Man in San Francisco.” Adam Newport-Berra cinematography on this film, every single frame of his work, is a piece of art you could frame on your wall. How this film could escape being nominated is incomprehensible. The Lighthouse was filmed on celluloid using lenses from the 1930s. The film’s approach to its cinematography is a direct choice to enhance the emersion and the character madness of the story. 1917 is its own achievement. While I know what they did, I can’t begin to tell you how they did it during certain sequences.

My Nominations for Best Cinematography in order of Preference.

The Last Black Man in San Francisco
The Lighthouse
1917
Shadow
John Wick Chapter 3

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “1917”. I know that I haven’t seen it, but when a film does something even remotely unique, and gets rid of that damn green screen, I feel like it needs to be celebrated. I’m certain this movie would bore the shit out of me, has nothing interesting to say, but is wonderful to look act. Sort of like Johnny Depp in recent years, amiright?

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917” – The technical achievement of the year. Roger Deakins was the only man who could show up Roger Deakins.

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917”. Same as above.

 

COSTUME DESIGN

“Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood”

“Little Women”

“The Irishman”

“Jojo Rabbit”

“Joker”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: 

“Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood” – In a very stacked category cool is always an element to consider. Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood has cool costume designs. It is frustrating to whiteness another miss for Dolomite is My Name as that film also oozes cool just as much as Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood. Little Women has an Auteur style for an adapted story, Irishman is sleek, and Jojo Rabbit’s Sam Rockwell has a fabulous uniform at the end. Sam Rockwell is fabulous!

My Nominations for Best Costume Design in order of Preference.

Once Upon a Time… In Hollywood
Dolomite is my name
Little Women
Knives Out
Sam Rockwell

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Jojo Rabbit”. Just from glancing through some photos of the costumes, I found JoJo Rabbit to have made some of the more interesting choices in this field. Although I loved Once Upon a Time’s entire decor, and I believe it will win, I have to be honest with you all. You deserve it.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Little Women” – Cool is not always recognized as technical. Little Women’s costume design is about art. Technical will win over cool.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood”. It’s a very specific time capsule of a film, and I think they nailed it. Especially Brad’s wardrobe when he is on that roof. Hot damn, amiright?

 

SOUND EDITING

“1917”

“Ford v Ferrari”

“Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker”

“Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood”

“Joker”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “Ford v Ferrari” – Sound Editing is the choice of sound effects, dialogue pieces, the capturing of foley effects, to be assembled for sound mixing. Sound Editing and Sound Mixing connected in the same way your left and right feet are connected in how well you can run. In the case of capturing and assembling all the unique sounds – Ford v Ferrier is a standout this year. 1917 could also be a win in this category.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “1917”. Always go with the war movie.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Ford v Ferrari” – SEE ABOVE!

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917”. Again, ALWAYS go with the war movie.

 

SOUND MIXING

“1917”

“Ford v Ferrari”

“Once Upon a Time… in Hollywood”

“Ad Astra”

“Joker”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “1917” – Ford v Ferrari and 1917 are excellent technical powerhouses. Both films’ mixing of dialogue, sound effects, foley work, and scores are incredibly produced. In the case of 1917, the crossing of no-man-land and bombed-out-village sequences are stand out examples of mixing. In the case of Ford v Ferrari, every single race sequence is also an achievement of balancing engine, dialogue and music levels. The quieter moments of 1917 are the small details of that movie which elevates it above the others.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “1917”. Always go with the war movie.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917” – SEE ABOVE!

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917”. Always go with the war movie.

 

ANIMATED SHORT FILM

“Dcera (Daughter)”

“Hair Love”

“Kitbull”

“Memorable”

“Sister”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “Memorable” – I wish it was not so difficult to see these films. As of writing this piece I have not seen any of these nominated films. One week before Awards Night is not a proper release for the general public. If you are waiting so late to put these films in a theater at least find a way to have them available on VOD. The home theater is better than not being able to watch theme at all.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Sister”. Just based on premise alone, I am very intrigued by this film the most. I’d also like to take this paragraph to plug the somewhat related doc on Amazon Prime entitled One Child Nation. You are going to cry.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Memorable” – SEE ABOVE!

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Sister”. Same as above.

 

LIVE ACTION SHORT FILM

“Brotherhood”

“Nefta Football Club”

“The Neighbors’ Window”

“Saria”

“A Sister”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “The Neighbors’ Window” – Everyone of this year’s Live Action Short Films are outstanding. Unlike last year, not every single one is tonally dark. The Neighbors’ Window adds a bit of comedy to the mix landing a wonderful story and theme. Nefta Football Club is a straight-up comedy worth a watch while Brotherhood and Saria tackle very of the moment issues.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Brotherhood”. Again, did not see, but most intrigued by this one.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Saria” – The final moments of this film had me weeping. The film leaves little hope and offers little in the sense of change but keeps the memory of 41 one young girls alive.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Brotherhood”. Same as above.

 

ORIGINAL SCORE

“1917,” Thomas Newman

“Joker,” Hildur Guðnadóttir

“Little Women,” Alexandre Desplat

“Marriage Story,” Randy Newman

“Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker,” John Williams

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: 

“Little Women” by Alexandre Desplat – A flip of a coin between Little Women and 1917. Little Women works as a record while 1917 works better as a film score. Little Women’s compositions emanate curiosity and innocence. Yes, John Williams is great – 52 nominations great. Randy Newman continues to be a shining light of awesomeness. It is disappointing to have not honored Uncut Gems or Honey Boy with a nomination. The music of Uncut Gems is the anxiety heart of that movie.

My Nominations for Best Original Score in order of Preference.

Uncut Gems
Little Women
1917
Honey Boy
Us

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Marriage Story,” Randy Newman. I learned a lot about Randy Newman this year, which has nothing to do with his work on Marriage Story, but I dig the guy. Not that he’s going to win, just being honest with the choice.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917,” Thomas Newman – For the reasons mentioned above. 1917 is an amazing film score complementing the visual achievement. Marriage Story could be a welcomed upset – Love You Randy!

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917,” Thomas Newman. All the technical awards!

 

VISUAL EFFECTS

“Avengers: Endgame”

“The Lion King”

“Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker”

“The Irishman”

“1917”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “1917” – Fuck off Lion King you are an animated movie, not special effects! The Irishman’s de-aging technology looks great but old man hips remain old man hips. Avengers Endgame is a special effects spectacular constructed mostly in front of a green screen. Even with its high-quality execution I still know I am watching special effects. This isn’t the 90s anymore. Every blockbuster has giant special effects now. Making the effects disappear into the background – that’s the challenge. 1917 conceals most of its special effects work into its world apart from a small sequence near the end of the film.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “1917”. Same as above.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917” – SEE ABOVE!

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “1917” Same as above.

 

FILM EDITING

“The Irishman”

“Ford v Ferrari”

“Parasite”

“Joker”

“Jojo Rabbit”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “Parasite” – Parasite is efficient without feeling efficient. Every cut means something in its serves to the story while never feeling present. While I was captivated by every chewy moment of The Irishman a three and a half-hour run time could have been cut down. Runtime does not equal bad I feel the form of film needs to be a balance between the story being told and the efficient at which that story is being delivered.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Jojo Rabbit”. I really don’t have an opinion on this, except that The Irishman BEST NOT win for this one. As the great Super Geeky Play Date host Brady Berserker would say, “You can’t un-70 year old man somebody”. Which is true, but if you’re making a movie with 108 year old De Niro curb stomping a guy when he’s supposed to be in his thirties, you gotta edit that shit better.

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Ford v Ferrari” – The most technical of the nominations. A classic old Hollywood throwback with very tight plotting and passing “driven” by the film’s editing. A two-and-a-half-hour movie that feels closer to a 110-minute runtime.

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Jojo Rabbit”. I just wanted to give one last nod to what will probably end up being my favorite film of 2019.

 

MAKEUP AND HAIRSTYLING

“Bombshell”

“Joker”

“Judy”

“Maleficent: Mistress of Evil”

“1917”

WHO CHRIS WANTS TO WIN: “Bombshell” – It is difficult enough to play historical figures let alone attempt to take on the attributes and mannerisms of living people. Bombshell’s makeup team has performed a magnificent job of turning these actors into the people they represent. I would say the same for the makeup work in Judy. 1917 brings a different angle to its makeup with the grim and gritty depiction of World War 1. While I would be ecstatic to see a 1917 upset, I feel this award is Bombshell’s to lose.

 

 

WHO RON WANTS TO WIN: “Joker”. Everything about Joaquin looked pretty damn gross. So, good job?

 

WHO CHRIS THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Bombshell” – SEE ABOVE!

 

 

WHO RON THINKS WILL ACTUALLY WIN: “Joker”. Same as above.

 

 

 

There you have it Folks! Get out there and vote!